Agir maintenant pour le Québec de demain, sous la direction de Luc Godbout.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agir maintenant pour le Québec de demain, sous la direction de Luc Godbout., Luc Godbout, Les Presses de l'Université Laval, 2006, 264 pages. L'ouvrage Agir maintenant pour le Québec de demain s'est fixé trois objectifs. Le premier est de mettre en lumière les positions divergentes des Lucides et des Solidaires; le second est d'ouvrir le dialogue entre les tenants de l'une et l'autre tendance; le troisième est de trouver des pistes de solutions qui pourront assurer le maintien des programmes sociaux tels qu'ils existent aujourd'hui pour les générations futures. On peut affirmer que l'ouvrage atteint le premier et le troisième objectifs, mais on ne peut en dire autant du second objectif, puisque le dialogue semble pour le moins difficile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".