MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157074599 · doi:10.1139/e04-005

Linearized quantities in transversely isotropic media

2004· article· en· W2157074599 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
P. F. Daley, Laurence R. Lines

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSlownessTransverse isotropyWavefrontIsotropyMathematical analysisPhase velocityPhysicsDimensionless quantityMathematicsOpticsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper advocates a modified parameterization for transversely isotropic (TI) media in seismology. Transversely isotropic media may be parameterized by the reference quasi-compressional (qP) and quasi-shear (qSV) velocities, α and β, together with the two parameters, ε and δ. These last two variables account for the deviation of the coupled qP and qSV modes of wave propagation from the isotropic case. The dimensionless quantity ε is a measure of the ellipticity of the qP wavefront. The "strange" parameter δ has been employed as a measure of deviation of the qP wavefront or slowness surface from an ellipsoid of revolution and also of the qSV wavefront or slowness surface from a sphere. As the parameter δ has been described as "conceptually inaccessible"; it is logical to determine an alternative characterization in physically realizable quantities. As in the earlier literature, the defining parameter for the degree of ellipticity of the qP slowness or energy surface in a TI medium is chosen here to be ε. In addition, the deviation of both the qP and qSV surfaces from the degenerate ellipsoidal case will be specified here as σ. An examination of the linearized phase (wavefront normal) velocities, and the linearized PP and SVSV reflection coefficients at an interface between two TI media is undertaken to emphasize the merits of this modified parameterization. All formulae used here have appeared in one form or another in the cited literature. In this paper, a reformulation of existing equations as functions of the two independent variables, (ε, σ), is presented. This results in a more physically realizable context for the linearized formulae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207