Comparison of the Pathogenesis of Two Genetically Different H3N2 Influenza A Viruses in Pigs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1997 and 1998, H3N2 influenza A viruses emerged among pigs in North America. Genetic analyses of the H3N2 isolates demonstrated that they had distinctly different genotypes. The most commonly isolated viruses in the United States have a triple-reassortant genotype, with the hemagglutinin, neuraminidase, and PB1 polymerase genes being of human influenza virus origin, the nucleoprotein, matrix, and nonstructural genes being of classical swine influenza virus origin, and the PA and PB2 polymerase genes being of avian influenza virus origin. In contrast, a wholly human H3N2 virus was isolated from a single baby pig in Ontario, Canada, in 1997, but it did not spread within the swine population. Genetic differences between this wholly human virus and the triple-reassortant viruses may affect their replication efficiencies in pigs. In the present study we compared the pathogenicities and replication kinetics of the wholly human virus and a triple-reassortant virus in 7-week-old pigs that were infected intranasally with 2 x 10(3) to 2 x 10(6) 50% tissue culture infective doses of virus. Our results demonstrate that the wholly human virus replicated to significantly lower titers and that the onset of virus shedding was delayed compared to the replication titers and the time of onset of virus shedding in triple-reassortant viruses. In addition, infection with the triple-reassortant virus was associated with moderate to severe gross pathological and histological pulmonary lesions, while infection with the wholly human virus induced only mild pulmonary changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".