MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157125111 · doi:10.5367/000000006776207627

Health Costs and Externalities of Pesticide Use in the Sahel

2006· article· en· W2157125111 on OpenAlex
Victorin A. Houndekon, Hugo De Groote, Chris Lomer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOutlook on Agriculture · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLivestock and Poultry Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of Canada
KeywordsHectarePesticideExternalityLivestockAgricultural scienceToxicologyEnvironmental healthAgricultural economicsBusinessAgricultureGeographyEconomicsEnvironmental scienceBiologyMedicineForestryAgronomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indirect costs of using pesticides in southern Niger were estimated and found to be significant. Using farmers' recall in a logit model, the effect of length of pesticide use on respiratory tract problems was demonstrated, as well as the effect of being a member of a village brigade treating pests on dermatological disorders. Health costs, defined as medical expenses plus the value of time lost, were found to increase by $0.46 per farmer for each year of pesticide use, or an average accumulated discounted health cost of US$1.70 per ha treated. Livestock losses due to intoxication were estimated at 0.5% per year for small ruminants and 0.2% for cattle, valued at US$0.33 per treated hectare. Costs of destroying obsolete pesticides were estimated at $0.06 per ha treated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it