Response of the whitespotted sawyer beetle, <i>Monochamus s. scutellatus</i>, and associated woodborers to pheromones of some <i>Ips</i> and <i>Dendroctonus</i> bark beetles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The response of whitespotted sawyer beetle, Monochamus s. scutellatus , to pheromones of the bark beetles, Dendroctonus rufipennis, Ips pini , Ips perturbatus and Ips latidens , and α ‐pinene was investigated with field‐trapping experiments. Traps baited with ipsenol caught significantly more M. s. scutellatus than unbaited traps, whereas the other compounds (ipsdienol, ipsdienol plus lanierone, ipsdienol plus cis ‐verbenol or frontalin) did not. Combining α ‐pinene with ipsdienol, ipsdienol plus lanierone, ipsdienol plus cis ‐verbenol or with frontalin did not increase captures of M. s. scutellatus above those of α ‐pinene alone, whereas the combination of α ‐pinene with ipsenol did. When α ‐pinene was combined with ipsdienol or frontalin, trap captures of Monochamus mutator were significantly higher than unbaited traps or traps baited with frontalin but were not higher than traps baited with α ‐pinene. The combination of ipsenol and α ‐pinene was significantly more attractive to Monochamus notatus than unbaited traps; however, traps containing either ipsenol or α ‐pinene were as attractive as the combination. None of the species of Buprestidae ( Buprestis maculativentris and Chalcophora virginiensis ) responded significantly to any of the treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it