Aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV: long-term clinical and hemodynamic results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Long-term durability and hemodynamics of stentless valves are unknown. Therefore, this study was undertaken to evaluate long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcome after aortic valve replacement with the Toronto stentless porcine valve (SPV) bioprosthesis at our institution. METHODS: Between 1991 and 1998, the Toronto SPV was implanted in 255 patients (mean age, 63+/-11 years, range 22-83 years, 181 males and 74 females). Preoperative diagnoses were aortic stenosis (76%), aortic insufficiency (12%) and mixed lesion (12%). New York Heart Association class III and IV were present in 49% (126/255) of the patients preoperatively. Mean valve size implanted was 26.5+/-2.1mm and in addition 34% (86/255) of the patients had coronary artery bypass surgery. RESULTS: Early mortality was 0.8% (2/255). Actuarial survival at 7 years was 90+/-3%. At 7 years, the freedom from cardiac death was 98+/-2%; from valve-related death, 99+/-1%; from valve reoperation, 97+/-2%; from structural valve degeneration, 97+/-2%; from thromboembolism, 95+/-2%; and from endocarditis, 99+/-1%. At 7 years of follow-up, the transvalvular peak and mean pressure differences across the aortic valve measured with Doppler echocardiography was 9.6+/-5.1 and 3.6+/-2.0 mmHg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Toronto SPV has provided excellent clinical and hemodynamic results up until 7 years of follow-up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".