G-ribo motif favors the formation of pseudoknots in ribosomal RNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analysis of the pseudoknots existing in the ribosomal RNA showed that four of them are formed with the help of G-ribo, a recently identified RNA recurrent motif. The analysis of these pseudoknots revealed two major aspects in the G-ribo motif structure, which together provide the structural context favoring the formation of two different types of pseudoknots. The first aspect pertains to a particular side-by-side juxtaposition of two double helices that facilitates switches of the polynucleotide chain between different strands. The second aspect deals with the presence of an adenosine at a specific place where it can stabilize a particular arrangement of two quasicoaxial helices required for the pseudoknot formation. Additional analysis shows that the latter aspect is also present in other pseudoknots not related to the G-ribo motif or the ribosome, and thus represents a general structural element favoring the formation of pseudoknots.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".