Artists, Performers, and Black Masculinity in the Haitian Diaspora
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Artists, Performers, and Black Masculinity in the Haitian Diaspora. By Jana Evans Braziel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008. ISBN: 0253219787.300 pp. $65.00 cloth, $24.95 paper. In Artists, Performers, and Black Masculinity in the Haitian Diaspora, Braziel investigates cultural constructions of black masculinity through the Haitian Kreyol concept of givo neg (big men in English) as represented in the works of six artists. Braziel investigates these representative figures embody the signified neg and (re-)define themselves beyond the signifiers and boundaries of race and ethnicity, gender and sexuality, nation-state, and citizenship in the Americas. The book gives special attention to the writer Dany Laferriere, film director Raoul Peck, drag queen and poet Assotto Saint (a.k.a Yves Francois Lubin), gender illusionist and drag king performer Dred (a.k.a. Mildred Gerestant), rap musician Wyclef Jean, and the poetartist Jean-Michel Basquiat. Braziel argues that black masculinity in the Haitian diaspora is a cultural phenomenon in terms of the respective writers and artists have reconfigured and reconstructed the notions of America and American identity. The author contends that big man-ism or neg is a engagement in the Haitian diasporic community and insists that the concept expresses cross-cultural politics, protest, and resistance. Accordingly, the book's key concern is an attempt to present a critical analysis of how Haitian diasporic writers, performance artists, film directors, and musicians are also altering notions of America and American identity and thereby participating in emergent forms of remapping (5), particularly in the United States and Canada. Artists, Performers, and Black Masculinity in the Haitian Diaspora begins with an introductory note on Transnational Politics of 'Big Man-ism' and ends with a reflective summary on Presidential Politics, Haiti's Gwo negs, and Diasporic Cultural Production as Transnational Political Protest. The book is subdivided into three equal parts: Part 1: Straight, Queer, and Street, Part 2: Queer Fist, and Part 3: Rapping B(l)ack. The author begins the essay by considering neg as a theoretical concept in its Haitian cultural and political milieus. She observes that Haiti's politics in particular has been subjected to the ritualistic practices and complex cultural codes of negs (1). From a general stance, to be a gwo neg in Haiti and its diaspora is to be a powerful man, one who commands respect, social stature, and, above all, authority (ibid). Gwo neg is also painted as a cult operating in a triangular dimension: local, national, and diasporic. In Part 1: Straight, Queer, and Street, Braziel contends that black heteromasculinity is both textual and deconstructive performances and constructions of the stereotype of black hyperheteromasculinity, arguing from the respective works of novelist Laferriere and filmmaker Peck. Braziel's rereading of Laferriere 's How to Make Love to a Black Man without Getting Exhausted situates the work as a poetic of freedom as well as a protest against the American construction of black heteromasculinity and the culturalideological imagination and connotation of the black male body/sexuality and identity. Braziel insists that Laferriere's concept of le Negre is an explosive dynamic in the Late-Capitalist American racial machine desirante, and argues for the need to read Laferriere's black masculine (reconstruction through diasporic distance. Finally, Braziel remarks that Laferriere's textual representations and philosophical engagements with black male sexuality in the context of a trans-American racial machine-desirante is an existential struggle for racial, sexual, and gender equality in the Americas (36). Next, Braziel engages filmmaker-producer Peck with particular attention to his most famous film: Haitian Corner, a movie that accentuates the impacts of Duvalierism and the state military apparatus both in Haiti and the Haitian diaspora, which Braziel identifies as transnational regimes of violence and state terror. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".