MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157195276 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2008.927217

Analysis of a Class-B Microwave-Photonic Link Using Optical Frequency Modulation

2008· article· en· W2157195276 on OpenAlexaff
Peter F. Driessen, Thomas E. Darcie, Jinye Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensity modulationModulation indexOpticsModulation (music)Frequency modulationPhysicsPhase modulationPhotonicsPhase noiseTelecommunicationsVoltagePulse-width modulationBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A class-B microwave-photonic link using optical frequency modulation (FM) and fiber-Bragg gratings (FBGs) is analyzed and results verified with measurements. Input voltage is converted linearly to FM, and this FM is converted by each FBG to intensity modulation. For small FM index beta, the signal increases as beta3, becoming linear in beta with a frequency offset or carrier leakage, and third-order distortion resulting from the detection process is shown to be worse than that obtained using a Mach-Zehnder intensity modulator at the same modulation index. For large beta( > 10), third-order distortion approaches zero and ideal class-B operation is predicted, and the only shot noise and relative intensity noise (RIN) added is that which arises from the detected signal power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207