MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157209385 · doi:10.1093/icvts/ivt358

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the acute treatment of cardiovascular collapse immediately post-partum

2013· article· en· W2157209385 on OpenAlexaff
W. Robert Leeper, Matthew Valdis, Robert Arntfield, Lina Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationResuscitationPulmonary embolismCaesarean sectionPost partumCoagulopathyAnesthesiaGestationThrombusIntensive care medicineSurgeryPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in a 30-year old woman at 37 weeks' gestation, following cardiac arrest from pulmonary embolism immediately post-partum from an emergent Caesarean section. In this case, ECMO was initiated though modified techniques with only the equipment available in a delivery room as a last resort to save a new mother after a significant downtime of 83 min. The patient received tissue plasminogen activator during the resuscitation resulting in significant blood loss. However, the patient was stabilized on ECMO and after 5 weeks in the intensive care unit achieved complete physical and neurologic recovery. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case where ECMO has been used in a resuscitation from massive pulmonary embolism immediately post-partum, after thombolytics were administered. Here, we discuss our strategies for emergent cannulation in a suboptimal environment, management of profound bleeding and oxygenation strategies in this hostile setting. Given the potential for success and the significant life-years gained, aggressive measures, such as ECMO, should be considered in such extreme life-threatening cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic SurgerySame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207