Development and Dissemination of Potentially Better Practices for the Provision of Family-Centered Care in Neonatology: The Family-Centered Care Map
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Family-centered care has become integral to the provision of quality neonatal intensive care. However, practices that reflect the core principles of family-centered care have not been described fully in the literature or implemented and evaluated consistently within newborn intensive care. The objective of this study was to create a family-centered care map that enhances the ability of the health care team to work with families to coordinate and deliver care in a holistic manner to meet the developmental, physical, and psychosocial needs of NICU patients and their families. METHODS: Potentially better practices were developed for sequential clinical phases by using standardized methods. These included focus groups with families, brainstorming sessions with staff, literature review, and input from established family advisory groups and family-centered care experts. Potentially better practices then were integrated into the family-centered care map that was configured in a Web-based format. Overall utility will be evaluated by determining the effect of the family-centered care map on length of stay, parental satisfaction, and family-centered care beliefs and practices among NICU staff. RESULTS: Sixty-three potentially better practices were identified for 7 clinical phases and 3 variations that were believed to characterize the clinical course of a typical NICU patient. A prototype of the Web-based family-centered care map that illustrates the clinical phases with links to the related potentially better practices, operational processes, and case studies was created. Baseline data from a care provider survey, from a family satisfaction survey, and on length of stay have been collected. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement methods and collaboration among 3 centers led to the development of an innovative Web-based resource to assist individual care providers and family advisors to provide comprehensive family-centered care to infants and families. Implementation of the family-centered care map has potential to affect positively the quality of newborn intensive care and lead to improved long-term outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.066 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".