Assessment of cardiac output as a predictor of metabolic rate in rainbow trout
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When water temperature was increased from 12 to 27°C at a rate of 2°C h −1 , oxygen consumption of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss was correlated strongly with both heart rate and blood oxygen extraction but the relationship with cardiac output was variable and weak. On the other hand, when water temperature was decreased from 21 to 12°C at a rate of 0·5°C h −1 , oxygen consumption was correlated with both heart rate and cardiac output but not with blood oxygen extraction. When fish were forced to swim increasingly faster, heart rate, cardiac output and blood oxygen extraction all correlated positively with oxygen consumption. For both cardiac output and heart rate, the slope of the regression line with oxygen consumption was elevated significantly more when the fish were forced to swim at increasingly higher swimming speeds than when water temperature was increased or decreased. The variation of the regression lines between cardiac output and oxygen consumption indicated that cardiac output presents few advantages over heart rate as a predictor of metabolic rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".