Granulocyte Macrophage Colony–Stimulating Factor–Driven Respiratory Mucosal Sensitization Induces Th2 Differentiation and Function Independently of Interleukin-4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of T helper (Th)2 responses is a key step in the pathogenesis of asthma. Interleukin (IL)-4 is thought to be important, although not strictly necessary, for Th2 differentiation, although triggers of IL-4-independent Th2 polarization have not been identified. We examined whether IL-4 is necessary for Th2-polarized responses during granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-driven respiratory mucosal sensitization. Balb/c wild type (WT) or IL-4 knockout (4KO) mice were exposed to aerosolized ovalbumin (OVA) in the context of airway GM-CSF expression. We examined the extent of Th2 polarization using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction on lymph node mRNA, flow cytometric analysis of lung Th cells, and measurement of cells, cytokines, and immunoglobulins in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and serum. GATA-3 and CCR3, -4, and -8 were expressed in the lymph nodes of WT and 4KO mice at similar levels, as were IL-5 and IL-13 levels in the BAL, T1/ST2 on lung Th cells, and BAL eosinophils after recall challenge. With the exception of immunoglobulin production, expression of GATA-3, CCR-3, -4, -8, IL-5, and T1/ST2, and the generation of blood eosinophilia, were intact in mice doubly deficient in both IL-4 and IL-13. We conclude that IL-4 is not required for the generation of Th2-polarized responses in the presence of GM-CSF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".