MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157266385 · doi:10.1093/ijlct/ctt028

Comparison of combined heat and power systems using an organic Rankine cycle and a low-temperature heat source

2013· article· en· W2157266385 on OpenAlex
Mohammed Khennich, Nicolas Galanis, Mikhaı̈l Sorin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganic Rankine cycleHeat exchangerThermodynamicsRankine cycleDegree RankineNuclear engineeringMass flow rateHeat capacity rateEnvironmental scienceMechanicsPower (physics)Materials scienceWaste heatHeat spreaderEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two combined heat and power (CHP) systems using an organic Rankine cycle with R134a and a source at 100°C are modeled. The vapor generator pressure which maximizes the specific (i.e. per unit mass flowrate of the heat source) net power output is determined for different values of the specific heat load and a characteristic temperature difference DT related to the temperature pinch of the heat exchangers. The optimal trade-offs between power and heat outputs are defined and explained for two CHP systems. The results show that both systems generate less mechanical power than the heat delivered to the heating load and that a higher fraction of the heat source is used as the heating load increases. The effects of the specific heat load and of DT on the total thermal conductance, the total exergy destruction and other variables are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it