MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157291908 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2006.878725

Optimized Delay Diversity for Suboptimum Equalization

2006· article· en· W2157291908 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Yiu, Robert Schober, Wolfgang Gerstacker

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEqualization (audio)FadingComputer scienceBit error rateTransmitterTransmission (telecommunications)Channel (broadcasting)Diversity combiningGSMChannel state informationWirelessElectronic engineeringDiversity schemeAlgorithmTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The optimization of delay diversity (DD) for linear equalization (LE) and decision-feedback equalization (DFE) is presented. The general case of transmission over a correlated multiple-input-multiple-output frequency-selective fading channel is considered. The proposed optimization requires the knowledge of the statistical properties of the wireless channel at the transmitter, but channel state information is only required at the receiver side. Based on an approximation of the bit error rate for LE and DFE, a stochastic gradient algorithm for optimization of the DD transmit filters is derived. Simulation results for the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM)/Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution system show significant performance gains of the proposed optimized DD scheme over the DD schemes reported by Gore et al. (Proc. IEEE Inter. Conf. Commun., 2002) and Hehn et al. (IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 4, p. 2289, 2005) if LE and DFE are used at the receiver

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207