MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157307985 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052709

Structural parameters of the hot pulsating B subdwarf PG 1219+534 from asteroseismology

2005· article· en· W2157307985 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversité de Montréal
FundersCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of ArizonaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesSmithsonian Institution
KeywordsAsteroseismologySubdwarfTelescopeLight curveFourier analysisStarsPhotometry (optics)OpacityAtmosphere (unit)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the last several years, we have embarked on a long term effort to exploit the strong potential that hot B subdwarf (sdB) pulsators have to offer in terms of asteroseismology. This effort is multifaceted as it involves, on the observational front, the acquisition of high sensitivity photometric data supplemented by accurate spectroscopic measurements, and, on the theoretical and modeling fronts, the development of appropriate numerical tools dedicated to the asteroseismological interpretation of the seismic observations. In this paper, we report on the observations and thorough analysis of the rapidly pulsating sdB star (or EC 14026 star) PG 1219+534. Our model atmosphere analysis of the time averaged optical spectrum of PG 1219+534 obtained at the new Multiple Mirror Telescope (MMT) leads to estimates of 33 600 ± 370 K and ± 0.046 (with ± 0.08), in good agreement with previous spectroscopic measurements of its atmospheric parameters. This places PG 1219+534 right in the middle of the EC 14026 instability region in the plane. A standard Fourier analysis of our high signal-to-noise ratio Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) light curves reveals the presence of nine distinct harmonic oscillations with periods in the range s, a significant improvement over the original detection of only four periods by Koen et al. (1999, MNRAS, 305, 28). On this basis, we have carried out a detailed asteroseismic analysis of PG 1219+534 using the well-known forward method and assuming that the observed modes have . Our analysis leads objectively to the identification of the (k, ) indices of the nine periods observed in the star PG 1219+534, and to the determination of its structural parameters. The periods all correspond to low-order acoustic modes with adjacent values of k and with , 1, 2, and 3. They define a band of unstable modes, in close agreement with nonadiabatic pulsation theory. Furthermore, the average dispersion between the nine observed periods and the periods of the corresponding nine theoretical modes of the optimal model is only ~0.6%, comparable to the results of a similar analysis carried out by Brassard et al. (2001) on the rapid sdB pulsator PG 0014+067. On the basis of our combined spectroscopic and asteroseismic analysis, the inferred global structural parameters of PG 1219+534 are 33 600 ± 370 K, ± 0.0057, ± 0.147, ± 0.012 , ± 0.0028, and ± 1.85. Combined with detailed model atmosphere calculations, we estimate, in addition, that this star has an absolute visual magnitude ± 0.06 and is located at a distance ± 23 pc (using ± 0.20). Finally, if we interpret the absence of fine structure (frequency multiplets) as indicative of a slow rotation rate of that star, we further find that PG 1219+534 rotates with a period longer than 3.4 days, and has a maximum rotational broadening velocity of 2.1 km s-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations83
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207