Evidence for Superantigen Involvement in Severe Group A Streptococcal Tissue Infections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Host-pathogen interactions were studied in tissue biopsy samples from patients with severe invasive group A streptococcus (GAS) infections. Skin, subcutaneous tissue, and fascia biopsy samples were divided into clinical grade 1 (no evidence of inflammation [n=7]) or clinical grade 2 (inflamed tissue--erythema and edema including cellulitis, fasciitis, and necrotizing fasciitis [n=24]). In situ imaging demonstrated significantly higher bacterial load in biopsy samples of higher clinical grade (P<.05), and the bacterial load correlated with the in vivo expression of the superantigen streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin F (P<.02). Increased expression of the interleukin-1 cytokines and significantly higher expression of tumor necrosis factor-beta, interferon-gamma, and the homing receptors CC chemokine receptor 5, CD44, and cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen (P<.002-.05) were observed in biopsy samples of higher clinical grade. Thus, the cytokine profile at the local site of infection mimics that of a typical superantigen cytokine response. The findings of this study demonstrate a critical role for superantigens and Th1 cytokines in GAS tissue infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".