MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157383194 · doi:10.7202/1006960ar

Joseph Michaud, c.s.v. (1822-1902), architecte

2011· article· fr· W2157383194 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
François Lanoue

Bibliographic record

VenueSessions d étude - Société canadienne d histoire de l Église catholique · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsCegep regional de Lanaudiere
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1848, du lointain Kamouraska arrive au tout neuf noviciat des Clercs de Saint-Viateur de L’Industrie (Joliette), un jeune homme de 26 ans : cours classique, expérience d’enseignement, profonde piété, talents pour les sciences et l’architecture. La communauté lui permet de développer ses dons. À L’Industrie, à Chambly, à Rigaud, à Victoria. 1868, Mgr Bourget l’envoie lever les plans de Saint-Pierre de Rome qu’il veut reproduire en petit à Montréal. C’est la maquette de Joseph Michaud qui fera décider la construction de la cathédrale de Montréal. Sa notoriété gagnera toute la province : églises, couvents, maisons privées, laboratoires, musée, collections, etc. Qui donc est ce clerc du bas-relief du monument de Mgr Bourget devant la cathédrale de Montréal, déployant des plans devant l’évêque en présence de quelques personnages dont l’un (Victor Bourgeau) a les bras croisés? Qui donc est ce jeune homme de 26 ans qui, en 1848, descend du « steamboat » de Lanoraie et arrive, peut-être à pied - car il en est capable - à L’Industrie (premier nom de Joliette), où le reçoit une communauté religieuse qui vient à peine de s’installer en terre canadienne? Qui donc est ce jeune homme « extrêmement timide » toute sa vie, qui nous arrive, mystérieusement dirait-on, de l’une des aînées de nos paroisses canadiennes-françaises, Kamouraska? C’est Joseph Michaud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSessions d étude - Société canadienne d histoire de l Église catholiqueSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207