MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157388181 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2002.1013108

Automated analysis of gene-microarray images

2003· article· en· W2157388181 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher Bowman, Richard Baumgartner, Stephanie A. Booth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsCanadian Science Centre for Human and Animal HealthNational Research Council Institute for Biodiagnostics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceThroughputArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Volume (thermodynamics)SpotsData miningBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

cDNA micro-arrays are a relatively new technology that allow the viewing of gene expression of many genes (or other DNA fragments) simultaneously. The output of a micro-array experiment is a pair of digital images, each of which show thousands of individual spots. This paper introduces a novel, operator independent, and reproducible algorithm for determining the relative intensities of these spots. This method permits high throughput analysis of micro-array images, which is very desirable given the volume of data collected. This algorithm for automated spot location makes use of the regular structure of the images to produce an initial approximation of spot location, which is then iteratively refined. The algorithm will be tested on micro-array images produced at the Canadian Centre for Human and Animal Health, as well as on publicly available micro-array images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGene expression and cancer classificationFrench-language works237,207