MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157410996 · doi:10.1109/rsp.2008.10

Application Specific Instruction Sets and their Impact on the Design Space Requirements of a Hardware Java Virtual Machine

2008· article· en· W2157410996 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Wood, Joseph C. Libby, Kenneth B. Kent

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayProcessor designJavaClock rateInstruction setEmbedded systemMulti-core processorSet (abstract data type)Computer architectureComputer hardwareParallel computingOperating systemProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The widespread availability of field programmable gate arrays (FPGA) coupled with different implementations of "soft-core" processors has created a need to find new methods for optimizing these processors. Because design space is limited on most FPGA's and the maximum clock rate of these processors is heavily bound to the overall size and resource usage it is necessary to find ways to minimize the size of the processor. One such way to minimize the size of a "soft-core" processor is to customize the instruction set on which it operates. Removing instructions that are supported but not utilized by target applications may provide a reduction in design space usage as well as an increase in maximum clock frequencies for the processor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207