MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157458051 · doi:10.1109/icassp.1988.196631

Modeling acoustic-phonetic detail in an HMM-based large vocabulary speech recognizer

2003· article· en· W2157458051 on OpenAlex
Li Deng, M. Lennig, V. Gupta, P. Mermelstein

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHidden Markov modelComputer scienceSpeech recognitionWord (group theory)VocabularyContext (archaeology)VowelSet (abstract data type)Artificial intelligenceDuration (music)Natural language processingAcousticsLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The acoustic recognizer of the INRS-Telecommunications 60000-word-vocabulary isolated-word recognition system is discussed. The task of the acoustic recognizer is to generate a list of word hypotheses and their likelihoods based on the acoustic data for each input word. Two sets of experiments are reported in which such knowledge is incorporated into the hidden Markov models (HMMs) used during recognition. In the first set, vowel duration properties are used in the HMMs. In the second set, word-initial and word-final stop consonants are modeled as a sequence of context-dependent subphonemes. The performance of the recognizer is significantly improved by appropriate utilization of the context-dependent vowel-duration information and the context-dependent microsegmental properties of stop consonants. >

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207