MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157458051 · doi:10.1109/icassp.1988.196631

Modeling acoustic-phonetic detail in an HMM-based large vocabulary speech recognizer

2003· article· en· W2157458051 on OpenAlexaff
Li Deng, M. Lennig, V. Gupta, P. Mermelstein

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHidden Markov modelComputer scienceSpeech recognitionWord (group theory)VocabularyContext (archaeology)VowelSet (abstract data type)Artificial intelligenceDuration (music)Natural language processingAcousticsLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The acoustic recognizer of the INRS-Telecommunications 60000-word-vocabulary isolated-word recognition system is discussed. The task of the acoustic recognizer is to generate a list of word hypotheses and their likelihoods based on the acoustic data for each input word. Two sets of experiments are reported in which such knowledge is incorporated into the hidden Markov models (HMMs) used during recognition. In the first set, vowel duration properties are used in the HMMs. In the second set, word-initial and word-final stop consonants are modeled as a sequence of context-dependent subphonemes. The performance of the recognizer is significantly improved by appropriate utilization of the context-dependent vowel-duration information and the context-dependent microsegmental properties of stop consonants. >

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207