MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157462546 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2009.4959801

Model-based non-linear estimation for adaptive image restoration

2009· article· en· W2157462546 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaolin Wu, Xiangjun Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverfittingUnderdetermined systemComputer scienceAutoregressive modelAlgorithmImage restorationPixelPiecewiseImage (mathematics)Nonlinear systemArtificial intelligencePiecewise linear functionMathematical optimizationMathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)Image processingStatisticsArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new image restoration algorithm that is driven by an adaptive piecewise autoregressive model (PAR). The strength of the new algorithm is its ability to preserve spatial structures better than its predecessors. The high adaptability is achieved by locally fitting 2D image waveform to the PAR model in moving windows. The problem is posed as one of nonlinear least-square estimation of both PAR parameters and original pixels, constrained by the degradation function. Robust solutions of the underlying underdetermined inverse problem are obtained by an innovative use of multiple PAR models that circumvent the issue of model overfitting, and by applying a structured total least-square technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207