MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reflection on the Pursuit of Harmonious Community

2010· article· en· W2157494192 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Honglin Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChina's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonious SocietySociologyCommunity organizationHumanitiesPolitical scienceValue (mathematics)EthnologyLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Community is the fundamental compound that people live and thrive in current society. There are many vital connections between community and society. Communities constitute the basic units of a society while society is the integration of communities. Therefore, a good community is the underpinning of a harmonious society. The development of society demands the development of communities. The crucial point to achieve the good community so as to build up the harmonious society is to comprehend the value and norms in the community culture and to properly extend these characteristics in the larger society. The paper started from interpreting the concepts and characteristics of the communities, analyzed the common natures and relations between community and society. It also deliberated the meaning of community building on the pursuit of a harmonious society. In addition, the article further discussed how to achieve a harmonious community and society through building up community cultural values. Key words: community; harmonious community; harmonious society Resume: La communaute est le cadre fondamental de la vie moderne, et elle constitue egalement l'unite fondamentale de la societe. Les liens sociaux sont nombreux et inevitables entre la communaute et la societe. La societe est une integration organique des communautes, et le developpement communautaire est devenue la demande de notre epoque et la base pour construire une societe harmonieuse. Par consequent, il faut saisir la direction du developpement communautaire a partir des valeurs socio-culturelles communes de la communaute et de la societe. A partir de la conception et les caracteristiques de la communaute, l’article tente de nous expliquer l’importance du developpement communautaire pour la construction d’une societe harmonieuse et il met l'accent sur les moyens de l’etablissement des valeurs culturelles de la communaute, a fin de construire une communaute harmonieuse et promouvoir l’harmonie sociale. Mots-cles: communaute; communaute harmonieuse; societe harmonieuse 摘 要:社區是現代人們生活的基本區域,也是社會基本構成單位,社區與社會有很多必然的聯繫。由於社會是社區的有機整合,社區的發展已成為時代的要求,成為建設和諧社會的基礎,因此需要從社區和社會文化價值觀的共性上準確把握社區發展的方向。本文旨在從社區的概念和特性出發,闡述社區發展對建設和諧社會的意義, 並著重討論如何從樹立社區文化價值觀入手達到社區和諧並促進和諧社會建設。 關鍵詞:社區; 和諧社區; 和諧社會

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.064
Scholarly communication0.0130.022
Open science0.0020.018
Research integrity0.0090.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicChina's Ethnic Minorities and RelationsFrench-language works237,207