MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157536652 · doi:10.1109/biocas.2008.4696911

Adaptive detection of action potentials using ultra low-power CMOS circuits

2008· article· en· W2157536652 on OpenAlexafffund
Benoit Gosselin, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsSubthreshold conductionCMOSElectronic circuitComputer scienceElectronic engineeringTransistorWaveformFilter (signal processing)Threshold voltageLow-power electronicsAnalogue electronicsVery-large-scale integrationUltra low powerPower (physics)VoltageElectrical engineeringPower consumptionEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present ultra low-power CMOS analog circuits for automatic detection of action potentials (APs). The proposed detection strategy locates AP waveforms and completely preserves their integrity. An adaptive threshold is implemented using a local time-averaging filter presenting a large time constant. The filter uses very small transconductances implemented by means of dedicated circuit techniques and subthreshold operation of MOS transistors. Also, a compact voltage squarer pre-processor is introduced to emphasize neural APs prior to detection. The proposed circuits were implemented in a CMOS 0.18-mum process and achieve ultra low-power consumption. Both circuits have been validated in simulations with synthetic neural waveforms. The adaptive threshold circuit dissipates only 27.2 nW, whereas the voltage squarer dissipates 76.7 nW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207