MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157537860 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2009.5117845

An enhanced scheme for second-order-statistics estimation in MIMO-OFDM systems

2009· article· en· W2157537860 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Wan, Wei‐Ping Zhu, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgorithmPerturbation (astronomy)MIMOOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingMean squared errorChannel (broadcasting)SIGNAL (programming language)MathematicsStatisticsTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The second-order statistics (SOS) of the received signal are very often used in blind and semi-blind channel estimation. In this paper, an analysis of signal perturbation in SOS of the received signal is first conducted, revealling that, even in the noise-free case, some SOS-based blind and semi-blind algorithms are subject to a signal perturbation error. Based on the analysis, a very efficient transmit scheme that can completely cancel the signal perturbation error at the receiver in the noise-free case is proposed. Computer simulations show that by employing the proposed signal perturbation cancellation approach, the mean square error (MSE) of the SOS estimate can be sufficiently suppressed in the noisy case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207