MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157548487 · doi:10.1093/brain/awh201

Brainstem neurodegeneration correlates with clinical dysfunction in SCA1 but not in SCA2. A quantitative volumetric, diffusion and proton spectroscopy MR study

2004· article· en· W2157548487 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Guerrini

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
FundersNational Ataxia Foundation
KeywordsSpinocerebellar ataxiaBrainstemCerebellumPonsCerebellar hemispherePsychologyAtaxiaPathologyAtrophyNeuroscienceNuclear medicineNuclear magnetic resonanceMedicineChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic resonance (MR) techniques enable in vivo measurement of the atrophy of the brainstem and cerebellum in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1) and 2 (SCA2) patients, which is accompanied by a decrease in the concentration of N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) or of the NAA/creatine ratio in the pons and cerebellum. Mean diffusivity (D) is emerging as an additional sensitive and quantitative MR parameter to investigate brain diseases. In order to explore differences between the MR features of SCA1 and SCA2 and correlate the MR and clinical findings in the two conditions, we examined 16 SCA1 patients, 12 SCA2 patients and 20 healthy control subjects. The MR protocol included T1-weighted 3D gradient echo sequences, single-voxel proton spectroscopy of the right cerebellar hemisphere (dentate and peridentate region) and of the pons with a PRESS sequence and an external reference quantitation method, and (in nine patients with SCA1 and nine patients with SCA2) diffusion-weighted echo-planar images with reconstruction of the D maps. The patients were evaluated with the Inherited Ataxia Clinical Rating Scale (IACRS). Compared with control subjects, the SCA1 and SCA2 patients showed a decrease (P < 0.01) in the volume of the brainstem and cerebellum and in the concentration of NAA in the pons and cerebellar hemisphere, whereas D of the brainstem and cerebellum was increased. No significant difference was observed between the SCA1 and SCA2 patient groups. No correlation between cerebellar volume and dentate and peridentate NAA concentration was found in SCA1 or SCA2 patients. The volume of the brainstem, D of the brainstem and cerebellum and the concentration of NAA in the pons were correlated (P < 0.05) with the IACRS score in SCA1 but not in SCA2. This discrepancy is in line with the clinical observation that the clinical deficit has a later onset and faster progression in SCA1 and an earlier onset and slower progression in SCA2, and suggests that neurodegeneration of the brainstem is a comparatively more rapid process in SCA1. In conclusion, our study indicates that SCA1 and SCA2 substantially exhibit the same MR features. The correlation in SCA1 between clinical severity and quantitative volumetric, diffusion MRI and proton MR spectroscopy findings in the brainstem indicates that these measurements might be employed for longitudinal studies and hopefully as surrogate markers in future pharmacological trials of this condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations114
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207