MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157598200 · doi:10.1100/tsw.2010.169

Role of Neutrophil Apoptosis in the Resolution of Inflammation

2010· review· en· W2157598200 on OpenAlex
Driss El Kebir, János G. Filep

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Scientific World JOURNAL · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsInflammationApoptosisImmunologyIn vivoSignal transductionCell biologyBiologyCancer researchBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutrophil granulocytes play a central role in host defense to infection and tissue injury. Their timely removal is essential for resolution of inflammation. Increasing evidence identified neutrophil apoptosis as an important control point in the development and resolution of inflammation. Delayed apoptosis and/or impaired clearance of neutrophils aggravate and prolong tissue injury. This review will focus on outside-in signals that provide survival cues for neutrophils, the hierarchy of pro- and antiapoptotic signals, and molecular targets in the antiapoptotic signaling network that can be exploited by endogenously produced bioactive lipids, such as lipoxins or pharmacological inhibitors, including cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, to redirect neutrophils to apoptosis in vivo, thus promoting resolution of inflammation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it