MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157604952 · doi:10.1109/icc.2002.996853

A blind adaptive receiver for interference suppression and multipath reception in long-code DS-CDMA

2003· article· en· W2157604952 on OpenAlexaff
A. Mirbagheri, Youngki Yoon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCode division multiple accessMinimum mean square errorAlgorithmMultipath propagationComputer scienceMultipath mitigationInitializationLeast mean squares filterInterference (communication)MathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Control theory (sociology)TelecommunicationsAdaptive filterStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines a blind adaptive implementation of a recently proposed linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) receiver for code-division multiple-access (CDMA) systems with aperiodic spreading sequences in multipath channels. The receiver has been previously shown to perform multiple-access interference (MAI) suppression and multipath diversity combining. The adaptive implementation is based on a fractionally spaced equalizer (FSE) whose taps are updated by the leaky constant modulus algorithm (LCMA) in the cold start and the decision-directed least-mean-square (DD-LMS) algorithm when the channel eye is opened. The LCMA adds a quadratic constraint, defined as the squared norm of the FSE weight vector, to the constant modulus (CM) cost function. Simulation results show that the LCMA with a uniform initialization strategy (all taps equally set to a small non-zero value) acquires all paths associated with the desired user, suppresses MAI, and opens the channel eye for the DD-LMS algorithm to converge to the proximity of the MMSE solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207