The Consequences of Lysosomotropism on the Design of Selective Cathepsin K Inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many drug candidates contain a basic functional group that results in lysosomotropism--the accumulation of drug in the acidic lysosomes of a cell. When evaluating inhibitors of lysosomal enzymes, such as the cathepsins, this physical property can have a dramatic impact on the functional selectivity of the test compounds. A basic P3 substituent in cathepsin K inhibitors provides a means of achieving potent and selective enzyme inhibition. To evaluate the whole-cell selectivity of the basic cathepsin K inhibitor L-006235, we identified the irreversible pan-selective cathepsin probe BIL-DMK and used it to design whole-cell enzyme-occupancy assays. These cell-based assays showed a dramatic reduction in selectivity against cathepsins B, L, and S relative to the selectivities observed in enzyme assays. Two-photon confocal fluorescence microscopy showed punctated subcellular localization of L-006235, which colocalized with BODIPY-labelled Lysotracker, consistent with compound lysosomotropism. To address this potential problem, a series of potent cathepsin K inhibitors was developed by replacing the P2--P3 amide bond with a metabolically stable trifluoroethylamine moiety. X-ray crystallography has identified the binding of this functional group to active-site residues in cathepsin K. This modification resulted in increased potency and selectivity that allowed the removal of the basic P3 substituent. The resulting nonbasic inhibitor L-873724 is a 0.2 nM inhibitor of cathepsin K with cathepsin B, L, and S potencies that were not shifted between purified enzyme and whole-cell assays; thus indicating that this compound is not lysosomotropic. L-873724 exhibits excellent pharmacokinetics and is orally active in a monkey model of osteoporosis at 3 mg kg(-1) q.d.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".