MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157620895 · doi:10.1144/1467-787302-019

Air–surface exchange of mercury in natural and anthropogenically impacted landscapes in Atlantic Canada

2002· article· en· W2157620895 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyFisheries and Oceans CanadaGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMercury (programming language)Natural (archaeology)GeographyEnvironmental scienceArchaeologyOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the relative importance of various sources of mercury within ecosystems and their subsequent impact on biota requires a thorough understanding of the biogeochemical cycling of mercury. An important component of the biogeochemical mercury cycle involves the exchange of gas-phase mercury between the atmosphere and various landscape surfaces. This study examines air–surface exchange (flux) of gaseous elemental mercury in selected undisturbed and anthropogenically impacted aquatic and terrestrial landscape settings. The objective of this study was to quantify air–surface mercury exchange rates in these contrasting landscape settings, to put constraints on these rates and provide insight into physical processes controlling mercury flux. Mean daily mercury flux was typically low over natural forest soils varying from −0.4 (net deposition) to 2.2 ng m −2 h −1 (net evasion). Minimum and maximum flux rates measured at these sites over the diurnal cycle ranged from a minimum of −1.3 to a maximum of 5.7 ng m −2 h −1 . Low flux rates from forest soils was partially due to poor light penetration through the forest canopy. Average daily mercury flux over undisturbed glacial till soil at an open field site with full sun exposure was also low (0.9 ng m −2 h −1 ) compared to the same soil mixed over a depth of 2 m (8.0 ng m −2 h −1 ). Mean daily mercury flux rates measured over pristine freshwater lake surfaces were also low (0.7–6.5 ng m −2 h −1 ), although the overall range in flux varied more widely (−0.3 to 44 ng m −2 h −1 ). Total mercury concentrations in marine water at a moderately polluted coastal harbour site (mean c. 0.8 ng l −1 ) and mean daily mercury flux rates over salt water (0.7 ng m −2 h −1 ) were similar to those measured over freshwater lakes. The highest daily average and diurnal range in mercury flux rates were measured at two abandoned gold mine tailings sites (130 and 237 ng m −2 h −1 ). The abandoned mine sites comprised tailings high in mercury content due to the past use of the mercury amalgamation process in gold extraction from the ore. Flux rates from tailings were two orders of magnitude higher than those observed over undisturbed native soils of similar parent material. Higher flux rates at the mine tailings sites were accompanied by ambient air concentrations 5–10 times background levels at 20 cm above the tailings. Mercury flux from vegetation has not been widely considered. A preliminary study of mercury flux from a white pine tree ( Pinus strobus ) indicated that actively growing trees might play a role in the atmospheric mercury cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it