MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Models of ice‐sheet hydrogeologic interactions: a review

2012· review· en· W2157640033 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeofluids · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyIce sheetGlacial periodIce-sheet modelGroundwater rechargeHydrogeologyGreenland ice sheetIce streamCryosphereGeomorphologyAquiferGroundwaterClimatologySea iceGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study reviews the state‐of‐the‐art and promising pathways to advance hydrologic models of groundwater flow systems and related transport processes in response to transient glacial loading. We also discuss the utility of hydrologic and geochemical data sets as a means of providing ground truth for these models. The paleohydrologic models presented herein should be used as analogues to assess high‐level nuclear waste repository stability in response to future episodes of glaciations in countries such as Canada, Sweden, and Switzerland. The next generation of fully coupled ice‐sheet‐aquifer models may also be of use in assessing rates of ice sheet denudation on Greenland and Antarctica in response to global warming. However, significant uncertainty exists in paleoclimatic forcing, paleohydrologic boundary conditions, and effective basin‐scale petrophysical parameters. Thus, model results must be viewed with some caution. Model results from studies reviewed herein suggest that during the last glacial maximum, recharge rates across glaciated basin margins increased by as much as 2–6 times modern levels. Paleohydrologic models predict that as ice sheets overran sedimentary basin margins, glacial melt water penetrated to depths of up to hundreds of meters. Recent ice‐sheet models that incorporated the effects of groundwater flow suggest that the presence of a 1–10 mm film of water at the glacial bed can increase basal ice sliding rates by up to 4 orders of magnitude. No firm theoretical basis exists for coupling ice sheet and subsurface hydrogeologic models nor the effects of permafrost on hydraulic conductivity. These issues could be resolved, to some degree, by additional careful experimental studies. Analysis of fluid pressures and flow rates beneath modern ice sheets using geochemical tracers would help to reduce the uncertainty regarding suitable hydrogeologic boundary conditions, parameterization of poromechanical coupling, and transport processes. Glacial geologists should work closely with modelers to provide better constraints on model boundary conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it