Bibliographic record
Abstract
De ses premiers romans, publiés chez Minuit, aux livres les plus récents, l’oeuvre de François Bon a connu une évolution importante. Si les préoccupations politiques n’étaient pas absentes de Sortie d’usine, elles étaient encore classiquement organisées par le registre de l’aliénation des travailleurs, audacieusement figurée par l’héritage formaliste de l’écrivain. Le retour à ce motif de l’usine à travers Daewoo donne à lire une double mutation : celle du politique, de plus en plus insaisissable et pourtant lourd d’effets — à l’image du Réel — et celle du récit qui cherche à le figurer. C’est à la mise en scène de micro-relations en tant que figurations du politique à l’état embryonnaire que je m’intéresserai, cherchant à repérer dans cette recension des rapports intersubjectifs une archéologie du politique qui se confond avec la nature même du récit plutôt que d’en être simplement l’objet.AbstractFrom his first novels, published by Éditions de Minuit, to his most recent books, Bon’s work has shown a notable evolution. If political concerns were not lacking in Sortie d’usine, they were still classically organized according to the register of worker’s alienation, though daringly figured through the writer’s formalist heritage. The return of the factory as a subject in Daewoo reveals a double mutation: that of the political, increasingly elusive yet heavy in its effects — just like the “Real” — and that of the narrative aiming at its figuration. This article will thus focus on the representation of micro-relations as figures of the political in an embryonic state, seeking to locate in this critical revision of intersubjective relations an archaeology of the political that merges with the narrative itself, rather than simply being its object.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".