MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157674791 · doi:10.5539/ass.v5n8p73

A Comparison and Research on the Sino-U.S Bilingual Education

2009· article· en· W2157674791 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Baoren Su

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaCompetition (biology)Face (sociological concept)Connection (principal bundle)Political scienceBilingual educationChinese educationHigher educationEconomic growthSociologyPedagogyEconomicsSocial scienceEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the coming of era of global economic integration and knowledge economy, China is increasingly opening its door to the outside world and actively making connection with international society. Under such circumstance, the Chinese education, especially higher learning education will certainly has a very close connection and interaction with the international education system, and this also means that Chinese higher learning education system will face the new challenge of how to train Chinese students to handle the international competition with bilingual ability. Therefore, it will be helpful for us to have a comparison and research on the bilingual education in China and the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicSecond Language Learning and TeachingFrench-language works237,207