Business and engineering project interaction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a result of industry feedback and the new ABET 2000 criteria, Seattle Pacific University (SPU) has begun to introduce multidisciplinary classroom interactive experiences between the business school and the electrical engineering department. This paper reports the way this interaction was implemented through a teaming effort undertaken between the School of Business & Economics and the Department of Electrical Engineering that was initiated in the Spring Quarter of 2001. The effort has consisted of providing joint classroom activities between student teams (three to five members) from a Business Operations Management class and an Electrical Engineering Design class. This work-in-progress paper provides the basic classroom activities that were undertaken, an indication of the educational experiences that were involved and a sampling of student verbal feedback. The authors' observations indicate that future expansion of this multidisciplinary interaction will likely make this work-in-progress a positive means to help meet their mutual departmental objectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it