MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157712553 · doi:10.1139/cjb-78-10-1254

Infection of Douglas-fir by <i>Leptographium wageneri</i>

2000· article· en· W2157712553 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul F. Hessburg, Everett M. Hansen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInoculationXylemBiologyHyphaBotanySporeDormancyHorticultureRoot rotDouglas firGermination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In three related experiments, root systems of 2-year-old Douglas-fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) seedlings were dip-inoculated with a viscous blend of Leptographium wagenerivar. pseudotsugae Harrington and Cobb spores and hyphal fragments and planted in a sterile potting medium. Infection frequency and points of entry were evaluated for dormant seedlings and seedlings that had been active for 4 and 8 weeks. All putative black stain infec - tions and other areas of sapwood discoloration were free-hand sectioned and examined with a bright-field microscope and phase-contrast optics. This technique was shown to be 100% reliable in a prior experiment with 223 inoculated Douglas-fir seedlings that paired microscope examinations with pathogen isolation. In this study, all lesions were sec - tioned and examined at 250-1000 diameters magnification for the presence of L. wageneri var. pseudotsugae hyphae and characteristic pathological anatomy. Complete root system dissections revealed that L. wageneri var. pseudotsugae infected roots through wounds and natural openings where a direct path to the xylem was exposed and never pene- trated living cortical or cambial tissues to infect its host. Among the dormant inoculated seedlings, 63% of infections occurred through wounds associated with nursery handling. Wound infection frequency decreased to zero in seedlings inoculated 8 weeks after coming out of dormancy. Seedlings inoculated 4 and 8 weeks after coming out of dormancy were most frequently infected through openings occurring at sites of new lateral root initiation. Infection of dead fine root stubs suggested that during periods of increased fine root mortality, these sites may be important for the new in- fection of healthy trees and egress from already diseased trees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFrench-language works237,207