Prevalence and Risk Factors of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Menopausal Women at HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To assess the prevalence and risk factors associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in Thai menopausal women.Materials and Methods: The eligible menopausal women were asked during a face-to-face interview to participate in the Thai Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Thai MoCA) test at HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center. Cognitive impairment was defined as a test’s score of 24 or less. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the variable associated with positive Thai MoCA test. Results:The authors found that 20 of the 120 participants were cognitively impaired. The significant associated risk factors were low education (adjusted odd ratio: 3.7; p= 0.03) and the number of concomitant medical diseases. The adjusted odd ratios for one, two and three diseases were 18.0, 42.1 and 88.9 respectively.Conclusion: The prevalence of MCI in menopausal women was 16.7 %. Early detection of this problem in vulnerable group will benefit to their cognitive performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".