MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157768779

Valorisation des résidus en terres agricoles au Québec et en France

2001· article· fr· W2157768779 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stanislas Wicherek, M. R. Laverdière, Alexandra Angéliaume, Claude Bernard, Marie-Odile Boissier, Denis Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers Agricultures · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryPolitical scienceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le cadre de recherches franco-quebecoises effectuees entre 1995 et 1997, cette etude propose une gestion integree des ressources et des pratiques agraires pour une utilisation rationnelle des terres de grandes cultures preservant le capital sol (structures, fertilite, infiltration) et la qualite des eaux. Les recherches portent sur la degradation des sols, la reduction des intrants de synthese par une utilisation raisonnee de sous-produits d'origine agricole (fumiers, residus de culture) ou non agricole (boues industrielles ou dechets urbains). Les principaux modes de recyclage des dechets organiques (enfouissement, incineration et valorisation agricole) sont analyses et les aspects legislatifs lies a leur utilisation sont compares dans les deux pays, ou ils sont en constante evolution. Les auteurs suggerent une gestion raisonnee afin de preserver la qualite de l'environnement, avec la mise en place d'un diagnostic spatial des problemes agro-environnementaux egalement utile pour gerer les paysages agraires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers AgriculturesSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207