MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157808034 · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-94851-9_2

Grundlagen des Risikomanagement

2003· book-chapter· de· W2157808034 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGabler Verlag eBooks · 2003
Typebook-chapter
Languagede
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Management
Canadian institutionsPricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kapitel 1.5.2 gibt bereits einen Überblick über die Funktionen und Aufgaben des Risikomanagement. Durch den alltäglichen Kontakt der Unternehmen mit Risiken ist oftmals ein punktuelles Risikomanagement anzutreffen. Ein systematisches, strukturiertes und flächendeckendes Verfahren findet sich jedoch selten. In den folgenden Kapiteln erfährt der Leser die theoretischen Grundlagen dieser Vorgehensweise. Zuvor soll jedoch auf die Unternehmensstrategie als notwendige Voraussetzung für erfolgreiches Risikomanagement eingegangen werden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it