MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157808725 · doi:10.1109/acc.2007.4282963

Tuning to Stabilize Adaptive Internal Model Controller for Periodic Disturbance Cancellation

2007· article· en· W2157808725 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Internal modelMinimum phaseActive noise controlController (irrigation)Computer scienceAdaptive controlStability (learning theory)Noise (video)Control (management)Transfer functionEngineeringNoise reductionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an application of adaptive internal model principle controller to an active noise cancellation problem. The algorithm is extended to handling the large phase delays that arise in active noise control problems because of the inherent transport delays. Internal model principle controllers, such as the integral action in a PI controller, require, as a necessary condition of stability, that gains are chosen to ensure negative feedback. Previously the algorithm had fixed gains which resulted in negative feedback, and stability, only for plants whose phase did not vary by more than 180 degrees. By adaptively tuning the two control gains in the feedback loop, this implicit phase requirement is eliminated. The new algorithm now requires, at a minimum, that no more than 100% uncertainty exists in the plant model. Simulations on Ben Amara's model of an acoustic duct show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it