Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente artículo analiza las representaciones del cuerpo americano bajo la mirada inquisitiva colombiana. Propongo que la manera de ver que se instaura está centrada en identificar ciertos rasgos corporales - como la ausencia de barba y armas - que el europeo identifica como anormalidades ya que estos funcionan como tropos de la masculinidad europea. Dichas imágenes se reiteran una y otra vez, para luego convertirse en motivos del espectáculo erótico masculino. El resultado de este acto epistémico violento es, por un lado la imagen del cuerpo indígena como un ser incompleto, anormal y mutilado por la visión imperial la cual no solamente lo despoja de sus tierras sino de su propio humanidad. Por el otro se da el establecimiento del europeo como un ser completo, normal y autosuficiente inscrito bajo ciertos rasgos específicos de subjetividad con los cuales le permiten construirse como sujeto universal por excelencia.This article analyses the representations of the American body under the inquisitive gaze of Columbus. This way of seeing aims to identify certain corporal features - such as the lack of beard and arms - that the European identifies as abnormalities since they represent tropes of European masculinity. Such images are constantly reiterated and later become motives for the masculine erotic spectacle. The result of this epistemic violent act is, on the one hand, the image of the American indigenous body as an incomplete, abnormal human being, mutilated by the imperial vision, which took over not only their territories but their humanity as well; on the other, it establishes the European body as a complete, normal and self-sufficient body, inscribed according to certain specific features of subjectivity, which allow Europeans to construct themselves as the universal subject par excellence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".