Index assignment optimization for joint source-channel MAP decoding
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Channel-optimized quantizer index assignment and maximum a posteriori (MAP) decoding have been extensively studied for error-resilient communications. An interesting and largely untreated problem is how to optimize the index assignment with respect to joint source-channel MAP decoding. In this paper we formulate the above problem as one of quadratic assignment, and discuss its solutions from very general to some special cases. For highly correlated Gaussian Markov sources and Hamming distortion, we can construct the optimal index assignment analytically. For general cases, simulated annealing algorithm is adopted to search for the optimal index assignment. Experimental results are presented to demonstrate the performance improvement of the index assignments optimized for MAP decoding over those designed for hard-decision decoding (e.g. Gray code). The reduction of symbol error rate and mean squared error can be as large as 40% and 50% respectively for highly correlated Gaussian Markov sources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it