MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157891449 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2015.05

Petrophysical Characterization of Bioturbated Sandstone Reservoir Facies In the Upper Jurassic Ula Formation, Norwegian North Sea, Europe

2015· article· en· W2157891449 on OpenAlexaff
Greg M. Baniak, Murray K. Gingras, Beverly A. Burns, S. George Pemberton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersConocoPhillips
KeywordsGeologyPetrophysicsFaciesNorwegianReservoir modelingPetrologyGeomorphologyGeochemistryGeotechnical engineeringStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: A petrophysical study of bioturbated shoreface sandstone rocks was completed by mapping local variations in air permeability measured in core samples acquired from the Upper Jurassic Ula Formation of the Norwegian Central Graben. Analysis of the shoreface fabrics resulting from bioturbation was studied using arithmetic, harmonic, and geometric numerical modeling and analytical techniques. The arithmetic mean best illustrates samples dominated by high volumes of horizontal or subvertical burrows (50–80%). The distal Skolithos to proximal Cruziana ichnofacies is an example of a rock fabric that can be characterized using the arithmetic mean. The harmonic mean best exemplifies samples dominated by low volumes of vertically oriented burrows (10–50%). The archetypal Skolithos ichnofacies is an example of a rock fabric that can be characterized using the harmonic mean. At extreme volumes of bioturbation (90–100%), isotropic flow units begin developing irrespective of burrow orientation. Numerical models of Ophiomorpha in two different sedimentary bedding features (laminated sandstone and massive sandstone) show that single-phase fluid flow is influenced by parameters such as burrow permeability, burrow connectivity, and bioturbation volume. Spot-permeametry measurements show that the Ophiomorpha burrows have higher permeability values than the host matrix. In the laminated-sandstone models, horizontal shale laminae and low bioturbation intensities promote lamination-parallel fluid flow. At higher volumes of bioturbation, fluid flow becomes increasingly isotropic due to greater amounts of burrow interpenetrations across mud laminae. In the massive-sandstone model, no flow barriers exist. As such, low volumes of bioturbation result in only minor influences on fluid flow. At higher volumes of bioturbation, greater burrow interconnectivity occurs and results in an enhancement of vertical and horizontal burrow permeabilities. Based on the results outlined above, this paper emphasizes the impact bioturbation plays in helping improve reservoir quality in the Ula Formation. Perhaps more importantly, the effectiveness of the numerical models presented to characterize fluid flow in different bioturbated fabrics (e.g., archetypal Skolithos ichnofacies) highlights the fact that the fluid-flow results outlined in this paper can also be applied more broadly to different shoreface successions using ichnofacies knowledge alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207