MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157898833 · doi:10.1109/icip.1995.537547

Automated facial conformation for model-based videophone coding

2002· article· en· W2157898833 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVideophoneComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceActive appearance modelCoding (social sciences)Face (sociological concept)Frame (networking)VideotelephonySequence (biology)Image (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order for model-based coding to be used on a head-and-shoulders video sequence, such as would be encountered in a videophone application, it is first necessary to form a model of the head. This model must be correctly conformed to the subject's face as it appears at the beginning of the video sequence transmission, so the subsequent deformations of the model accurately depict changes in the face and head from frame to frame. This paper proposes a method which allows this conformation to be performed entirely automatically. The method presented utilizes flexible template matching and a steepest-gradient search method to determine the optimal conformation of a generic facial model to represent a given single frame of a face. Results illustrating the success of the method are given and the limitations of the algorithm are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it