MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157969333 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2003.1293902

An independent wavelet reconstruction implementation for image fusion

2004· article· en· W2157969333 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanchromatic filmMultispectral imageImage fusionArtificial intelligenceComputer visionWaveletComputer scienceImage resolutionMultiresolution analysisWavelet transformIterative reconstructionImage restorationImage (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Image processingDiscrete wavelet transform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new wavelet reconstruction implementation for image fusion is proposed in this study. This reconstruction implementation is derived from Mallat's algorithms. Using the reconstruction implementation, components for a panchromatic image can easily be modified through various image enhancement or filtering operations in order to improve the consistency with a multispectral image, prior to the fusion of images. In addition, more detailed components from the panchromatic image can be extracted and fused with the multispectral image thereby improving its spatial resolution. Visual and statistical analysis indicates that the new wavelet based image fusion method performs better at improving the spatial resolution while preserving the spectral characteristics of the multispectral imagery, when compared to conventional wavelet based image fusion methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image Fusion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207