MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157972842 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00593.2002

Vascular adaptations to pregnancy in mice: effects on myogenic tone

2002· article· en· W2157972842 on OpenAlexaff
Sukrutha Veerareddy, Christy‐Lynn M. Cooke, Philip N. Baker, Sandra T. Davidge

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyogenic contractionEndocrinologyInternal medicineNitric oxide synthaseNitric oxideEndotheliumProstaglandinMesenteric arteriesVasoconstrictionVascular smooth musclePregnancyBlood vesselChemistryMedicineBiologySmooth muscleArtery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanisms underlying vascular adaptations in pregnancy remain to be fully elucidated. One of the contributory mechanisms for reduced vascular tone may be a reduction of myogenic tone. Myogenic tone was assessed as the difference between internal diameter in the presence and absence of external calcium at different intramural pressure steps (60-100 mmHg). Myogenic responses were reduced in resistance-sized mesenteric and main uterine arteries in late pregnant compared with nonpregnant C57BL/6J mice. In vessels from pregnant, but not nonpregnant mice, the myogenic response was enhanced by preincubation with nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester, was further elevated by the gap junction inhibitor 18-alpha glycyrrhetinic acid, but was unaltered by the prostaglandin H synthase inhibitor meclofenamate. Endothelium removal enhanced myogenic tone only in the vessels from pregnant animals, thus confirming the role of the endothelium in modulating myogenic tone in pregnancy. These results suggest that endothelium-derived NO as well as gap junction communications modulate myogenic tone in mouse pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207