MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Varicella‐zoster infection in pediatric solid‐organ transplant recipients:A hospital‐based study in the prevaricella vaccine era

2001· article· en· W2157981771 on OpenAlexaff
Anand Pandya, Samia Wasfy, Diane Hébert, Upton Allen

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Transplantation · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVaricella zoster virusVaricella vaccineChickenpoxSepsisPopulationChickenpox VaccineOrgan transplantationImmunosuppressionImmunologyDiseaseTransplantationPediatricsVirusImmune systemImmunizationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We reviewed 58 cases of varicella-zoster infection that occurred between 1988 and 1998 in 47 pediatric solid-organ transplant recipients. The median age of patients at the time of admission with varicella-zoster infection was 8.0 yr (range 1-17 yr). The median interval between transplantation (Tx) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection was 1.6 yr (range 0.06-9.3 yr). Varicella infection occurred at a rate of one case for every seven transplant recipients. Among the 58 cases of VZV infection, 53% were varicella while 47% were herpes-zoster. Varicella infection occurred despite treatment with varicella-zoster immune globulin (VZIG) in 17 of 31 cases of varicella infection. However, the disease was generally mild with severe disease occurring in only two patients. One patient (1.7%) died as a result of bacterial sepsis. There was no significant relationship between VZV infection and specific immune suppressants. Episodes of rejection were more likely to be temporally associated with the occurence of herpes zoster than with varicella infection (p = 0.02). The data generated provide useful background information in our population in the prevaricella vaccine era.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric TransplantationSame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207