Breaking new ground? Reflections on greening school grounds as sites of ecological, pedagogical and social transformation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we explore greening initiatives in school grounds as sites \nwhere ecological, pedagogical, and social transformation might be promoted \nand take place. Reflecting on our evaluations of school ground greening initiatives \nin Canada and England, we note that these initiatives are often at \nthe margins of young peoples' experiences in schools and that their potential \nto be truly transformative can go unrealized. A series of tensions are \nhighlighted in addressing a shift towards realizing their potential; these \ninclude situating greening school grounds more explicitly within the curriculum \nand securing broader institutional support. We also identify a more \nradical option, the repositioning of the kinds of outdoor learning that \noccurs in green school grounds as the basis of teaching and learning in \nSterling's (2004) vision for 'sustainable education.'
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it