MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158018348

A dual high-speed PMSM motor drive emulator with finite element analysis on FPGA chip with full fault testing capability

2011· article· en· W2158018348 on OpenAlexaff
Yuji Inaba, Sébastien Cense, Tarek Ould‐Bachir, Hironobu Yamashita, Christian Dufour

Bibliographic record

VenuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulated-gate bipolar transistorField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceSolverPulse-width modulationFault (geology)Electronic engineeringEngineeringEmbedded systemElectrical engineeringVoltage
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a FPGA-based virtual motor drive system featuring two Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine (PMSM) drives made with two-level IGBT/GTO inverters model with full fault capability. The inverters are implemented on the FPGA with a nodal solver, using floating point arithmetic, and support individual component faults, like a single IGBT open fault, as well as other non-standard modes, like cases with no IGBT gate signals and natural rectification. The motor model can be either linear d-q models or Finite Element Analysis models from JMAG-RT. The virtual motor drives are implemented on a Virtex-6 FPGA card and have a total latency near 1μs from the IGBT gate signal capture at Digital Inputs to motor currents at Analog Outputs and are therefore well adapted for HIL tests with high-speed machine with either PWM (up to 100 kHz) or hysteretic current control. Finally, the paper presents experimental accuracy validation made by a TIER-1 supplier for hybrid electric vehicle in Japan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207