MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158022704 · doi:10.1142/s0218863509004932

BROADBAND PUMP–PROBING INSIDE AN OPTICAL PARAMETRIC AMPLIFIER

2009· article· en· W2158022704 on OpenAlexaff
Jason Riordon, Vincent Basque, Alain Haché

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nonlinear Optical Physics & Materials · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTransition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadbandFemtosecondOptical parametric amplifierMaterials scienceAmplifierOptical amplifierParametric statisticsOpticsOptoelectronicsLaserSpectroscopyOptical pumpingModulation (music)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use an optical parametric amplifier to obtain and demonstrate a fast and flexible pump–probe system with minimal conversion needed. The readily aligned laser may be used to quickly test samples with broadband pump–probing as well as femtosecond time-resolved spectroscopy. As a proof of concept, we produce results on optical modulation in vanadium dioxide thin films similar to that previously obtained by other groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nonlinear Optical Physics & MaterialsSame topicTransition Metal Oxide NanomaterialsFrench-language works237,207