MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158069038 · doi:10.1109/cdc.1992.371199

A novel high resolution parallel spectral estimation method for narrow-band signals

2005· article· en· W2158069038 on OpenAlexaff
W. Liu, R. Doraiswami

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFast Fourier transformSingular value decompositionParametric statisticsAutoregressive modelAlgorithmComputer scienceNonparametric statisticsSIGNAL (programming language)InverseSpectral density estimationAutoregressive–moving-average modelParametric modelFourier transformMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A high resolution parallel algorithm is proposed for estimating the spectrum of a narrow-band signal from a short data record. The algorithm is based on combining the nonparametric and parametric approaches, where the nonparametric approach is used to decompose the measurement data into an orthogonal set of components, and the parametric approach is used to estimate the model of these components in parallel. A fast Fourier transform (FFT) is used to decompose the signal. A singular value decomposition (SVD)-based linear predictive coding algorithm (LPCA) is used to obtain an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model of the signal components. The FFT of the signal components is translated to the low-frequency region, and their inverse FFTs are decimated before estimating the ARMA model so as to separate the closely-spaced modes. The spectra of the estimates are translated back to their original location. The proposed algorithm is evaluated using simulation.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207